Iqbal Ahmad Hakeem, Nair Ul Nisa


The idea of perceived organizational support has overtime gained much significance with the view that if employers want their employees to be committed and loyal towards their organization, employees in turn want their organization to pay back by being focused towards their needs. In view of rule of reciprocity, employees try to reciprocate, when they feel that they are supported by their employers and that their efforts are being recognized and rewarded by their organization. Therefore, being loyal and committed to the organization as well as performing their jobs as desired by the organization is the best possible way for them to reciprocate. Thus, organizations need to improve those conditions that influence organizational support perception of their employees, so that they perform as per the organizations requirements. Further, organizations need to manage and monitor employee perceived organizational support to ensure employee loyalty, commitment and performance. Against this backdrop, the paper attempts to identify the factors that determine organizational support perception of employees. Further, the paper explores the important outcomes of perceived organizational support. This study is important in the view that it bridges the human resource management and organizational behavior literatures by linking employee perceptions of a variety of human resource practices. The objectives of the paper in particular have been; to explore the various factors that determine perceived organizational support, and to find out the various consequences of perceived organizational support based on existing research literature.


: Perceived Organizational Support; Organizational Commitment; Performance; Human Resource Practices

Full Text:



Ahmed, I., & Nawaz, M. M. (2015). Antecedents and outcomes of perceived organizational support: A literature survey approach. Journal of Management Development, 34(7), 867-880.

Ahmed, I., Nawaz, M. M., Ali, G., & Islam, T. (2015). Perceived organizational support and its outcomes: A meta-analysis of latest available literature. Management Research Review, 38(6), 627-639.

Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of applied psychology, 75(1), 51.

Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507.

Great Place to work Institute I. FORTUNE’s 100 best companies to work for nomination and application process; 2007.

Guzzo, R. A., Noonan, K. A., & Elron, E. (1994). Expatriate managers and the psychological contract. Journal of Applied psychology, 79(4), 617.

Hutchison, S. (1997). A path model of perceived organizational support. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 159-174.

Kossek, E. E. & Nichol, V. (1992). The effects of on-site child care on employee attitudes and performance. Personnel Psychology, 45, 485-509.

Ladd, D., & Henry, R. A. (2000). Helping coworkers and helping the organization: The role of support perceptions, exchange ideology, and conscientiousness1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(10), 2028-2049.

Levering, R., & Moskowitz, M. (2007). In good company. Fortune, 155(1), 94.

Levinson, H. (1965). Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization. Administrative science quarterly, 370-390.

Meyer, J. P., & Smith, C. A. (2000). HRM practices and organizational commitment: Test of a mediation model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17(4), 319.

Nasurdin, A. M., Hemdi, M. A., & Guat, L. P. (2008). Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between human resource management practices and organizational commitment. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 13(1), 15-36.

Randall, M. L., Cropanzano, R., Bormann, C. A., & Birjulin, A. (1999). Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of organizational behavior, 159-174.

Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 698.

Riggle, R. J., Edmondson, D. R., & Hansen, J. D. (2009). A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job outcomes: 20 years of research. Journal of business research, 62(10), 1027-1030.

Shore, L. M., & Shore, T. H. (1995). Perceived organizational support and organizational justice. Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the workplace, 149-164.

Shore, L. M., & Wayne, S. J. (1993). Commitment and employee behavior: comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. Journal of applied psychology, 78(5), 774.

Shore, L. M., & Tetrick, L. E. (1991). A construct validity study of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support. Journal of applied psychology, 76(5), 637.

Sluss, D.M., M. Klimchak and J.J. Holmes (2008). Perceived organizational support as a mediator between relational exchange and organizational identification, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73: 457-464.

Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663.

UÇAR, D., & ÖTKEN, A. B. (2013). Perceived organizational support and organizational commitment: The mediating role of organization based self-esteem. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(2).


  • There are currently no refbacks.