COMPARISON OF FACULTY RETENTION: A STUDY OF PRIVATE AND GOVERNMENT PROFESSIONAL INSTITUTES OR UNIVERSITIES OF UTTARAKHAND
The study attempts to explain the comparative study of the various factors that affect satisfaction and retention of the faculty working with the government and the private educational sector. Employee retention is the ability of an organization to retain its employees, especially the most talented ones. Attrition is a problem that most universities are constantly faced with. The research study aims at studying different perspectives of teachers working in the private and the government Institutes or universities of Uttarakhand, that lead to job satisfaction and retention. The researcher has discussed different components with various factors that contribute towards that component. The study does a comparative study by using a t-test that has been shown in tables. The study discusses reasons why a particular sector faces more attrition as compared to another. The research has been conducted in the academic organizations such as the universities and colleges of Uttarakhand region as per the objective of the research.
Amar, A. D (2004), "Motivating knowledge workers to innovate", A model integrating Motivation dynamics and antecedents, European Journal of Innovation Management.
Abassi, S.M., & Hollman, K. (2000). Turnover: The real bottom line. Public Personnel Management, Fall. Retrieved October 6, 2006 (http://www.findarticles.eom/p/articles/mi qa3779/is 200010/ai n8926885)
Bogdanowicz, M., & Bailey, E., (2002). The value of knowledge and the values of the new knowledge worker: Generation X in the new economy. Journal of European Industrial Training, 26(2), 175-193.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2003).Keeping Good Teachers: Why It Matters What Leaders Can Do. Educational Leadership, 60,6-13.
Johnson, J. T., Griffeth, R W. & Griffin, M. (2000). Factors discriminating functional and dysfunctional sales-force turnover. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 15(6), 399-415.
Joshi B. K., (2009) “Reflections on Reform of Higher Education in Uttarakhand” Occasional paper, (online at http://www.doonlibrary.org/download/occasional_paper_1.pdf)
Luekens, M. T., Lyter, D. M., & Fox, E. E. (2004). Teacher Attrition and Mobility: Results from the Teacher Follow-up Survey, 2000-01 (NCES 2004-301). U.S. Department of Education.
Ministry of HRD website (http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/DmdUniv.pdf)
Murnane, R. J., Singer, J. D., Willett, J. B., Kemple, J. J., & Olsen, R. J. (1991). Who will teach? Policies that matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
National Assessment and accreditation council- an autonomous institution of University Grants Commission website (http://web5.kar.nic.in/naacloi_new/NAAC_allcycles_accrlist.aspx)
National Board of accreditation website (http://www.nbaind.org/views/Home.aspx#sthash. UskbR20h.jS422vj8.dpbs)
Porter, J. (2011) Attract and Retain Top Talent. Strategic Finance, 92(12), 56-60
Taylor, W. (2007), "The Effect of Lengthening Job Tenure on Managers' Organizational Commitment and Turnover", Organization Science, vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 632-648.
University Grants Commission website (http://www.ugc.ac.in/stateuniversitylist.aspx?id=34 &Unitype=2)
Uttarakhand Government Portal website (http://uk.gov.in/details/view/112-universities--institutes)
- There are currently no refbacks.